Sign DVARP’s Petition to Get Restrooms and Trash Cans on SEPTA’s Next Order of Regional Rail Cars

Hi all,

I hope you’re having a great weekend, and are ready for some serious heat. I still can’t believe it’s going to be close to 90 degrees on Monday. I’m posting to draw your attention to a petition DVARP just created (http://www.change.org/petitions/dvarp-is-trying-to-get-bathrooms-and-trash-cans-on-septa-regional-rail-trains/) to get SEPTA to include restrooms and trash receptacles on their next Regional Rail train order (Silverliner VIs). While rail and transit authorities in Chicago and New Jersey (just to name a couple) offer these amenities, SEPTA does not. DVARP is proud to lead the charge to get SEPTA to eventually include bathrooms and trash cans on its trains. Please sign our petition and spread the word about it. Your bladder and your trash will thank you.

Andy Sharpe
Communications Director
Delaware Valley Association of Rail Passengers
1601 Walnut St., Suite 1129
Philadelphia, PA 19102-2913
phone: 215-RAILWAY (215-724-5929)
e-mail: sharpe@dvarp.org

7 thoughts on “Sign DVARP’s Petition to Get Restrooms and Trash Cans on SEPTA’s Next Order of Regional Rail Cars

  1. Terrific work! This is the type of info that are supposed to be shared across the web. Shame on the seek engines for no longer positioning this put up upper! Come on over and seek advice from my website . Thank you =)

  2. The signs were paid for by a separate grant that was itnended specifically to pay for enhancements like this one, but even if it wasn’t, it wouldn’t add up to enough money to fund later transit operation on an ongoing basis. Unless another source of ongoing revenue for operation can be identified, whether by more tax income (like a special assessment) or some other source of income (like selling advertising at stations or on trains, a worthwhile idea in my opinion) there isn’t a way to fix the damage done by the past couple of state budgets that totally defunded local transit systems. Currently, federal grants can only be used to expand transit lines, not to fund regular operation, because new construction is a one-time expense and operation is a regular, recurring expense. I realize that CoolDMZ is already bored by these boring details about how things work, but sometimes I can’t resist the urge to skip the occasional fact across his stream of consciousness.RT’s paper-thin budget and very large service area make improvements like later operation and filling in transit gaps very difficult. Not having enough money to properly develop and operate a transit system leaves one with a half a boat situation having half a boat is not 50% as useful as having a whole boat, it’s pretty much useless even though it costs half as much as a whole boat. Our transit system is a little better than that as mentioned above, it is acceptably adequate for some things but for other things it would be nice to have transit for (like visiting outer suburbs, or getting home after 9 PM) it’s about as useful as half a boat.And then, of course, there are the people who don’t want transit anywhere near them, and fight it tooth and nail, because then THOSE PEOPLE (you know, those people) would be able to visit their neighborhood with impunity, as though they had a right to be there or something.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>